Research Visual Presentation:
Humor Strategies in Comedy Movies: Revealing the Evolution of Humor Strategies and Social Commentary in Comedy Films
Research Posts Links:
Research Visual Presentation:
Humor Strategies in Comedy Movies: Revealing the Evolution of Humor Strategies and Social Commentary in Comedy Films
Research Posts Links:
In the research of the article, I realized that the evolution of comedy should be observed on a longitudinal timeline, so I began to search for information about ancient Greek comedy, the source of modern comedy, hoping to find evidence that comedy reflects society.
Ancient Greek new comedy refers to a form of comedy from 323 BC to 263 BC. It is developed on the basis of Chinese comedy. It mainly describes love stories and civic life, reflecting the social style and humanistic spirit of the Hellenistic period. The characteristics and development history of ancient Greek new comedy are as follows:
The representative writer of the new comedy in ancient Greece is Menander, who is known as the “king of comedy”. His works include “The World-Hater”, “The Female Robber”, “The Lucky Soldier”, etc. His style influenced the later Roman comedy and European comedy(Konstan, 1995).
The structure of the ancient Greek new comedy is relatively standardized, generally composed of five scenes, separated by the chorus between each song, the role of the song team is not much, only to play the role of embellishment and transition. The language of the new comedy is relatively popular, and the formula is relatively simple, which is easy to perform and enjoy.
The influence of ancient Greek new comedy on modern comedy is mainly reflected in the following aspects:
The new comedy of ancient Greece created a comedy mode that takes love as the main line, and finally reaches a happy ending through misunderstanding, conflict, twists and surprises. This mode is called “comedy routine”, which is widely used in modern comedies, such as 50 First Dates and Leap Year.
The new comedy of ancient Greece created some typical and universal comedy characters, such as farmers, merchants, slaves, diners, geisha, etc. These characters represented different social classes and human characteristics, and their personalities and behaviors were realistic, but also full of humor and irony. These characters also have many counterparts and references in modern comedies. Such as Friends, Modern Family, The Big Bang Theory and so on.
It can be found that there are some differences between modern comedy and ancient Greek comedy, such as the weakening of political criticism and the emergence of various humor strategies. After all, no one wants to watch the same kind of comedy and the comedy of teaching.
Knowing that a large part of modern comedy is derived from ancient Greek comedy, I began my attempt to separate the consciousness of “man” and “God” from that of the two. In Hennefeld’ s words(2022), you can see a modern scholar’s deep understanding of today’s comedy film: a metaphysical madness, a volitional influence, providing a different emotional experience.
Finally, the research direction is determined, that is, based on these two points, two completely different types of modern and modern iconic films are compared, so as to reflect the society’s choice of comedy films.
Reference
Hennefeld, M., 2022. ‘The problem of film comedy in the twenty-first century’. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 20(1), pp.101-118.
Konstan, D., 1995. Greek comedy and ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
In terms of ancient Greek comedy, scholars generally recognize Menander as one of the representative figures of this period. As Konstan, David (1995, P.4) puts it: “Menander adapts the plots to a subtle and sympathetic examination of contemporary social issues. “His work emphasizes the trivial as well as the comic aspects of civil society, maintaining a balance between “political criticism” and “humanity”. This tradition of real-life comedy laid the groundwork for the later development of humor strategies.
Back in the realm of cinema, Charlie Chaplin’s Modern Times (1936) is widely regarded as one of the classics of comedy cinema. During this period, the balance between “humanity” and “political criticism” was upset. In the midst of social upheaval and professional danger, Chaplin attempted to combine cinematic technology with social critique by presenting the culture of the Modern Age as a profoundly unstable state of contemporary society (Howe, Lawrence, 2013, p. 45). The extreme mockery of the mechanized society shown in the film and the film’s depiction of unemployment and the current state of life show Charlie Chaplin’s thoughts on the reality of society. The silent format of the film allows the audience to focus on Chaplin’s unique body language, which can be understood as a quasi-ritualized and socially acceptable satirical act (Caron, James E, 2006, P.5). presenting the audience with a multi-layered comedic experience.
In contrast, Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) represents another facet of modern comedy. Due to the film’s unique approach to artistic design, black humor, and borrowing from classical literary traditions, the film is attached to a form of comedy that is both absurd and insightful. Through an in-depth analysis of the complexity of the plot and the relationships between the characters, the innovative nature of the film and its unique focus on social issues have made it one of the most important representatives of contemporary English-language comedic cinema.
In the evolution of humor strategies, the ancient Greek form of comedy shifted from a purely political satirical genre to a new comedic genre that shifted the focus of portrayal from the “gods” to the “human”. From modern times to contemporary times, the humor strategies of film comedy have become more focused on using humor to free the audience from anxiety about the material world, dissatisfaction, and incredible relief in the face of danger (Hennefeld, Maggie, 2022, p. 102). Although modern comedies still view “human beings” as the main object of portrayal, they intentionally make “human nature” more prominent and reduce the “political criticality” of the story to an imperceptible depth. In modern comedies, there is often an undercurrent of melancholy, cleverly hidden behind technique and artistry, so that the audience is not immediately aware of this dimension (Seitz, Matt Zoller, 2015, p. 19). The story of the movie, however, is still based on the characteristics of ancient Greek comedy, making stories derived from life an integral part of the comedic production.
Overall, through a comprehensive study of Ancient Greek New Comedy, Modern Times and The Grand Budapest Hotel, we are able to understand the evolution of humor strategies in comedy films in a more intuitive way. From the classical era to the era of classic movies and finally to the contemporary era, the entertainment that comedy movies did not have at the beginning of their creation is being slowly tapped out, which is more of a skillful reflection of social and global cultural changes. This provides a theoretical basis for subsequent research and echoes the main question of this study, how comedy films reflect and shape social perceptions through humor strategies.
bibliographies
Caron, J.E., ‘2006. Silent slapstick film as ritualized clowning: the example of Charlie Chaplin’. Studies in American Humor, 14, pp.5-22.
Hennefeld, M., 2022. ‘The problem of film comedy in the twenty-first century’. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 20(1), pp.101-118.
Howe, L., 2013. ‘Charlie Chaplin in the age of mechanical reproduction: reflexive ambiguity in Modern Times’. College Literature, 40(4), pp.45-65.
Konstan, D., 1995. Greek comedy and ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seitz, M.Z., 2015. The Wes Anderson Collection: The Grand Budapest Hotel. New York: Abrams.
Topic title: How humor strategies enhance the aesthetic value and expressive power of animated films/ The use and analysis of humor strategies in animated films/ The humor strategies of animated films: Creativity, intelligence and criticality
Short paragraph: Animated films use humor strategies to make us laugh and enjoy their stories. These strategies are not random or accidental, but rather follow some types and rules that depend on the language, visuals, situations, characters and other elements of the films. Humor strategies can do more than just entertain us, they can also help us to pay attention, relax, understand and appreciate the films better. They are a form of artistic expression that shows the creativity and intelligence of the filmmakers, as well as the emotions and wisdom of the viewers. They deserve our further study and exploration. However, humor strategies are not flawless, they also have some drawbacks and limitations that we need to be aware of and critical of when we use and evaluate them.
Keywords: humor strategies
animated films
types and rules
effects and functions
creativity and intelligence
drawbacks and limitations
Key literature: González, R.C.L. (2017) Humorous elements and translation in animated feature films: DreamWorks (2001-2012). MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación, 9, pp. 279-305.
Dehbashi Sharif, F. and Mirafzali, F. (2019) Study of different types of humor and their dubbing in “Zootopia” animation regarding Martinez-Sierra model. Quarterly Scientific Journal of Audio-Visual Media, 13(29), pp. 209-225.
Ezell, S.K. (2016) Humor and satire on contemporary television: Animation and the American joke. London: Routledge.
The story arc:
Characters: The main characters of the film are:
How does film language convey the meaning and value of animated films in terms of their themes and viewpoints?
Animated film is a special form of film, it is not limited by reality, it can create a variety of imaginary scenes and characters, but also can learn from and imitate the real film language, to enhance the sense of reality and expression of animation. Animated films have rich meaning and value. They can reflect and criticize social reality, show and inherit cultural traditions, and express and inspire life philosophy.
Film language conveys the meaning and value of animated films through various techniques and techniques, among which symbolism, metaphor and contrast are the most common and effective ones. A symbol is the use of a concrete object or image to represent another abstract concept or emotion, 0 metaphor refers to the use of one thing or image to imply the characteristics or relationships of another thing or image and so on.
How is the significance and value of American culture to contemporary animated films reflected in the themes and perspectives of animated films
American animation has a significant impact on national culture all over the world, and the output of its culture and value can be a good entry point for this paper. How can cross-cultural communication values be reflected in the language of animated films through the analysis of American cartoons
The question of whether animated documentaries are legitimate or not depends on how we view animation as a way of showing reality. Can animation tell the truth and be ethical, or does it always change and twist the facts because of how it is made? Some scholars, like Christina Formenti, think that animation belongs to docu-fiction, a genre that mixes reality and fiction, because she believes that what we see on the screen is not objective. But other scholars, like Annabelle Honess Roe, say that animation can be an effective way of making documentaries, because it can show the feelings, thoughts, and memories of the people involved, and also keep a distance from what happened.
One example named Persepolis (2007) is an animated film that deals with issues of equality, diversity, and social injustice. It is based on the true story of Marjane Satrapi, who wrote and directed the film with Vincent Paronnaud. The film shows her life in Iran during and after the Islamic Revolution, and how she faced problems with her identity, freedom, and exile. The film uses a simple animation style in black and white, like the comic book that it is based on. The film contrasts her personal story with the political situation, the differences between people and groups, and the changes over time. The film also questions the stereotypes and prejudices that Western audiences may have about Iran and its people, and reveals the rich and diverse culture and history of Iran. The film is a strong and moving example of how animation can be used to show and share personal and social issues, and to challenge the dominant stories and images of reality.
Hayao Miyazaki, the co-founder of Studio Ghibli, is a director who has left a lasting mark on the animation industry. His films, such as Spirited Away, Princess Mononoke, and My Neighbor Totoro, are widely acclaimed for their stunning animation, rich storytelling, and memorable characters. Miyazaki is a master of various animation techniques, from hand-drawn to computer-generated, and he pays close attention to every detail of his work. He oversees every stage of the production process, from storyboarding to editing, to ensure his vision is realized on the screen. Miyazaki’s films also reflect his distinctive style and vision, which are influenced by his personal views and beliefs. He explores themes such as nature, environmentalism, feminism, pacifism, spirituality, and childhood in his films, and he creates complex and nuanced characters who face moral dilemmas and challenges. He often features strong, independent, and courageous female protagonists who defy stereotypes and expectations. He also incorporates elements of Japanese culture, folklore, and mythology into his films, creating a unique and captivating world for his audience. Miyazaki’s films are not only entertaining but also thought-provoking. He expresses his love and admiration for nature and its beauty, as well as his nostalgia for a simpler and more innocent time. He also criticizes the problems of war, pollution, human greed, and social injustice that plague the modern world. He challenges the conventional notions of good and evil, heroism and villainy, and presents ambiguous situations that invite the audience to think and question. Miyazaki is an auteur who has a unique and influential voice in the world of animation.
Without saying, color is a key element in the short film Collision (by Max Hattler), as it not only creates a stunning visual effect, but also expresses the film’s message and meaning. The film uses the colors and patterns of the American flag and Islam to represent two diverse cultures and political views. The film depicts the clash, conflict and dialogue between these two forces by transforming, rearranging, colliding and merging these colors and patterns. The color scheme of the film also matches the pace and tone of the film, such as:
This short film is a dazzling display of colors, and the way they mix and clash reveals the author’s observations and opinions.
This short film tells its story through a narrator, who brings the audience into the story world with his words, gestures, and expressions. He is not just a voice-over, but also a character who interacts with the others and influences the story. This narration style gives the short film a theatrical and literary flair, and keeps the audience engaged with the plot. Unlike conventional films, this film can be seen as a story that can be read as well as watched.
Symmetry is a signature style of Wes Anderson, who uses it to create a balanced and orderly visual effect. In The Swan, there are many shots that are perfectly symmetrical, such as:
These symmetrical shots are beautiful, but they also create a sense of discomfort and irony for the audience, as if they are trapped in the story world.